Former prime minister fires at Trump, Australia's major parties
Share
Former prime minister fires at Trump, Australia's major parties | Breaking News & Latest Australia Updates
Former prime minister fires at Trump, Australia's major parties — By Sean Tarek Goodwin Topic:Australian Federal Elections Australia's former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has taken aim at the US president.(ABC New...
By Sean Tarek Goodwin
Topic:Australian Federal Elections
Australia's former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has taken aim at the US president.(ABC News: Marcus Stimson)
Malcolm Turnbull has publicly criticised both Donald Trump and Australia's major political parties.
Speaking at the ABC's final Your Say panel, the former prime minister described Mr Trump as a "bully", and said Australia's leaders should do more to stand up for the country.
However, others on the panel suggested a hardline approach towards the US may not be the best option.
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has called US President Donald Trump a "bully" and criticised Australia's major parties for not standing up to him.
Speaking at the ABC's final Your Say panel — hosted by ABC Radio Sydney Mornings presenter Hamish Macdonald at the broadcaster's Parramatta studios — Mr Turnbull said he had counselled Australian leaders to take a harder stance in negotiations with the president.
Federal election live updates:Get the latest news from the campaign trail
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage onABC iviewandABC Listen
"The Australian prime minister should go to Washington [D.C.] and stand up for Australia. I mean, it makes me want to vomit," Mr Turnbull told the program.
"There has been a conga line of sycophants and lobbyists and grifters and advisors saying, 'Oh, you've got to flatter Trump, suck up to him,' and all they end up getting is more bullying."
The Your Say panel also included former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzulo, the US Studies Centre's Hayley Channer and Macquarie Univeristy's Lavina Lee.(ABC News: Marcus Stimson)
He said newly elected Canadian President Mark Carney had taken a more effective approach.
"Is Mark Carney on his knees? Are the Canadians on their knees? You know what their motto is, 'Elbows up', which basically means a bit of biffo in ice hockey."
Hayley Channer from the US Studies Centre, argued the softer approach taken by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was more likely to get a favourable outcome.
Mr Turnbull pointed to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's approach to Mr Trump as the example Australian leaders should follow.
"If you think about the way that the current prime minister, Anthony Albanese tried to evade the tariffs, it was all about packaging up a deal," Ms Channer said.
The panel also discussed the AUKUS deal, with Mr Turnbull arguing Australia was unlikely to receive any nuclear submarines from the agreement.
"The problem we've got at the moment is that both sides of politics are in denial, it is bipartisan gaslighting," he said.
The ABC's Vote Compass can help you understand your place in the political landscape.
"They don't have to sell us any [submarines], unless they conclude that their navy doesn't need them, and their navy is currently about 20 subs short of what they say they need, and they're producing about half as many as they need to replace the ones that are retiring."
Former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo agreed that the US has a capability gap with its own submarines.
He said the government should stay the course with the deal but also look at contingencies.
The AUKUS deal was also discussed, with Mike Pezzullo advising for contingency plans to be considered.(US Navy)
The panel also discussed the risk of conflict in the Asia-Pacific, with Lavina Lee from Macquarie University arguing that issue hasn't been given enough air time in the election.
"There are not enough frank conversations about the actual seriousness of the strategic competition that's going on around us and the risk of conflict in the region, and it's sooner rather than later," Dr Lee said.
"If we look forward in five to 10, years' time, people will be looking back at this election and judging our political leaders and both sides politics for not making this more of an issue."
Having trouble seeing this form? Trythis link.
Topic:Budget
Topic:Unrest, Conflict and War
Analysis by Stephanie Dalzell
Topic:Federal Government
Topic:Elections
Topic:Government
Topic:Voting
Topic:Elections
Topic:Cost of Living
Australian Federal Elections
Federal Parliament
Parramatta
Sydney
Voting
Topic:Budget
Topic:Unrest, Conflict and War
Analysis by Stephanie Dalzell
Topic:Federal Government
Topic:Elections
Topic:Budget
Topic:Unrest, Conflict and War
Topic:WNBL
Topic:Homicide